You may find it useful to read this chapter first. How will this guidance help me? Measuring health and safety is not easy and there are no simple answers.
But this guidance provides: We would like to capture your views and experience in order to develop and expand the ideas further.
There are key questions which the most senior managers in an organisation should be asking themselves. What information is available to assure me that throughout the organisation arrangements to control health and safety risks: This guidance aims to give you some useful information to help you address these questions.
What the guidance is not This guidance does not provide: Why is guidance necessary? Measurement is a key step in any management process and forms the basis of continual improvement.
If measurement is not carried out correctly, the effectiveness of the health and safety management system is undermined and there is no reliable information to inform managers how well the health and safety risks are controlled.
Although there is much information available on performance measurement generally, there is little which looks at health and safety in particular which organisations can apply to their own circumstances.
They struggle to develop health and safety performance measures which are not based solely on injury and ill health statistics. A common feature of the measures quoted would be that they are generally positive in nature — reflecting achievement — rather than negative, reflecting failure.
While the general business performance of an organisation is subject to a range of positive measures, for health and safety it too often 5 comes down to one negative measure, injury and ill health statistics — measures of failures.
Health and safety differs from many areas measured by managers because success results in the absence of an outcome injuries or ill health rather than a presence. But a low injury or ill-health rate, even over a period of years, is no guarantee that risks are being controlled and will not lead to injuries or ill health in the future.
This is particularly true in organisations where there is a low probability of accidents but where major hazards are present. Here the historical record can be a deceptive indicator of safety performance.
Organisations need to recognise that there is no single reliable measure of health and safety performance.
As organisations recognise the importance of managing health and safety they become aware of the problems with using injury and ill-health statistics alone as the only measure of health and safety performance.
Whether a particular event results in an injury is often a matter of chance, so it will not necessarily reflect whether or not a hazard is under control.· a framework for measuring health and safety performance; · guidance on developing health and safety performance measures relevant to your organisation; and · useful references to information sources on performance measurement generally, including tools and techniques.
A GUIDE TO MEASURING HEALTH & SAFETY PERFORMANCE December MEASURING HEALTH AND SAFETY PERFORMANCE Contents Introduction How will this guidance help me? What the guidance is not Why is guidance necessary?
Measurement is an important part of any management process and forms the basis for continuous improvement. Measuring safety performance is no different and effectively doing so will compound the success of your improvement efforts.
Finding the perfect measure of safety is a difficult task. Performance Plan Objectives There are three major metrics that should be evaluated when measuring the performance at Patton-Fuller Hospital.
The first objective is a strong and efficient adherence to the stated fiscal budget of the hospital. Measuring safety performance is no different and effectively doing so will compound the success of your improvement efforts. Finding the perfect measure of safety is a difficult task.
What you want is to measure both the bottom-line results of safety as well as how well your facility is doing at preventing accidents and incidents. Jan 18, · Posted By Mark Preston This doesn't appear to me to have had much publicity so far - or if it has, it has passed me by - the HSE has just published a guide to measuring health and safety.
|Guide to Measuring Hse Performance - monstermanfilm.com||The paper explores shaping public health impact assessment tools for tilapia, a novel emergent aquaculture sector in the UK. Globally, aquaculture produced over 65 million tonnes of food in and will grow significantly requiring apposite global public health impact assessment tools.|
|Measure health and safety performance - OHS Reps||Lagging indicators are the traditional safety metrics used to indicate progress toward compliance with safety rules.|
|Measuring health and safety performance||Checklists Measure health and safety performance Too often, the only measures used in workplaces and by government authorities are 'negative' measures. These are known as outcome indicators, and while they are important, they generally reflect the results of past actions.|
|A Short Guide to Leading and Lagging Indicators of Safety Performance||What the guidance is not Why is guidance necessary? Introduction Providing information Answering questions Decision making Addressing different information needs What to measure Introduction Measuring the hazard burden Measuring the health and safety management system Measuring failure - reactive monitoring Measuring the health and safety culture Planning and implementing - a more detailed look When to measure performance Who should measure performance How to measure performance Introduction Deriving performance measures References Further information Feedback 2 3 INTRODUCTION This new document developed by HSE provides practical guidance for people who understand the principles of health and safety management and wish to improve the measurement of health and safety performance in their organisations.|